Screener
GKAT vs RYLG
Scharf Global Opportunity ETF vs Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF
Key differences
GKAT is an equity ETF, while RYLG is an alternative ETF. GKAT charges 0.59% a year and RYLG 0.35%.
- GKAT is an equity fund, while RYLG is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- GKAT follows a active selection strategy; RYLG uses option income.
- GKAT covers global markets; RYLG covers North America.
- RYLG costs 0.24% less per year.
- GKAT is much larger than RYLG. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- GKAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GKAT | RYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $165M | $8M |
| Since | 2014 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 7.32% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +28.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +12.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.56 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.11% |
| Max drawdown | -10.41% | -22.37% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.