Screener
GLOF vs BDYN
iShares Global Equity Factor ETF vs iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF
Key differences
- GLOF costs 0.20% less per year.
- BDYN is significantly larger than GLOF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GLOF is classified as equity, while BDYN is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- GLOF follows a index tracking strategy; BDYN uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| GLOF | BDYN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $196M | $2.7B |
| Since | 2015 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.57% | 0.96% |
| Asset class | equity | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.27 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.63% | — |
| Max drawdown | -34.12% | -10.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GLOF and BDYN
Explore further