Screener
GLOF vs IMFL
iShares Global Equity Factor ETF vs Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Key differences
Both GLOF and IMFL are equity ETFs. GLOF charges 0.20% a year and IMFL 0.34%. The main difference: GLOF follows a index tracking strategy; IMFL uses active selection.
- GLOF follows a index tracking strategy; IMFL uses active selection.
- GLOF covers global markets; IMFL covers global markets excluding the US.
- GLOF costs 0.14% less per year.
- IMFL is much larger than GLOF. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, GLOF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GLOF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GLOF | IMFL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.34% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $212M | $1.0B |
| Since | 2015 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.50% | 2.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.8% | +26.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.2% | +16.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.9% | +7.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.18 | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.98% | 16.14% |
| Max drawdown | -34.12% | -33.25% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.