Screener
IMFL vs INTF
Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs iShares International Equity Factor ETF
Key differences
- INTF costs 0.18% less per year.
- INTF is significantly larger than IMFL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IMFL follows a active selection strategy; INTF uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, INTF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- INTF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IMFL | INTF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.34% | 0.16% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $957M | $3.4B |
| Since | 2021 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 3.02% | 2.64% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.7% | +27.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.6% | +19.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.2% | +10.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 1.01 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.80% | 14.65% |
| Max drawdown | -33.25% | -40.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IMFL and INTF
Explore further