Screener
GLOF vs XVV
iShares Global Equity Factor ETF vs iShares ESG Select Screened S&P 500 ETF
Key differences
- XVV costs 0.12% less per year.
- XVV is significantly larger than GLOF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GLOF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GLOF | XVV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $196M | $636M |
| Since | 2015 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 1.57% | 0.92% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.0% | +29.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.7% | +23.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.1% | +14.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.27 | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.63% | 12.83% |
| Max drawdown | -34.12% | -27.20% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GLOF and XVV
Explore further