Screener
GLOW vs DFAX
VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF vs Dimensional World ex U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF
Key differences
- DFAX costs 0.44% less per year.
- DFAX is significantly larger than GLOW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GLOW follows a index tracking strategy; DFAX uses active selection.
- DFAX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GLOW | DFAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.72% | 0.28% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $52M | $11.5B |
| Since | 2024 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 1.17% | 2.30% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.0% | +36.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +20.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.12 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.40% | 14.88% |
| Max drawdown | -15.58% | -28.15% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GLOW and DFAX
Explore further