Screener
GLRY vs IWF
Inspire Growth ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Key differences
Both GLRY and IWF are equity ETFs. GLRY charges 0.80% a year and IWF 0.18%. The main difference: GLRY follows a active selection strategy; IWF uses index tracking.
- GLRY follows a active selection strategy; IWF uses index tracking.
- IWF costs 0.62% less per year.
- IWF is much larger than GLRY. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, IWF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GLRY | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $164M | $132.3B |
| Since | 2020 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.24% | 0.33% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.6% | +19.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.9% | +23.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.0% | +14.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.81% | 15.95% |
| Max drawdown | -40.60% | -32.72% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.