Screener
GLRY vs IWO
Inspire Growth ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF
Key differences
Both GLRY and IWO are equity ETFs. GLRY charges 0.80% a year and IWO 0.24%. The main difference: GLRY follows a active selection strategy; IWO uses index tracking.
- GLRY follows a active selection strategy; IWO uses index tracking.
- IWO costs 0.56% less per year.
- IWO is much larger than GLRY. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, GLRY has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GLRY | IWO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $164M | $14.7B |
| Since | 2020 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.24% | 0.40% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.6% | +35.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.9% | +17.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.0% | +5.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | 0.66 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.81% | 22.08% |
| Max drawdown | -40.60% | -42.01% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.