Screener
GLTR vs PALL
abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF vs abrdn Physical Palladium Shares ETF
Key differences
Both GLTR and PALL are commodity ETFs. GLTR charges 0.60% a year and PALL 0.60%. The main difference: GLTR is much larger than PALL. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- GLTR is much larger than PALL. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, GLTR has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| GLTR | PALL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.9B | $754M |
| Since | 2010 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | commodity | commodity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | — | — |
| CAGR 1Y | +45.5% | +21.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +30.4% | -4.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.1% | -15.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.01 | 0.01 |
| Volatility 1Y | 37.97% | 50.61% |
| Max drawdown | -30.10% | -73.63% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.