Screener
GMF vs ADIV
State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF vs Guinness Atkinson Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF
Key differences
- GMF costs 0.29% less per year.
- GMF is significantly larger than ADIV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GMF is classified as alternative, while ADIV is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- GMF follows a index tracking strategy; ADIV uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| GMF | ADIV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.78% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $386M | $55M |
| Since | 2007 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.39% | 2.78% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.7% | +19.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.9% | +17.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.8% | +7.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 0.85 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.22% | 13.26% |
| Max drawdown | -40.18% | -31.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GMF and ADIV
Explore further