Screener
GMOD vs EAOA
GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF vs iShares ESG Aware 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
Key differences
GMOD is an alternative ETF, while EAOA is a mixed asset ETF. GMOD charges 0.01% a year and EAOA 0.18%.
- GMOD is an alternative fund, while EAOA is a mixed asset fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- GMOD follows a tactical allocation strategy; EAOA uses index tracking.
- GMOD costs 0.17% less per year.
- EAOA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GMOD | EAOA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.01% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $39M | $37M |
| Since | 2025 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.95% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +22.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 11.29% |
| Max drawdown | -6.50% | -25.06% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.