Screener
GMOD vs AOA
GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF vs iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
Key differences
GMOD is an alternative ETF, while AOA is a mixed asset ETF. GMOD charges 0.01% a year and AOA 0.15%.
- GMOD is an alternative fund, while AOA is a mixed asset fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- GMOD follows a tactical allocation strategy; AOA uses index tracking.
- GMOD costs 0.14% less per year.
- AOA is much larger than GMOD. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- AOA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GMOD | AOA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.01% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $39M | $3.2B |
| Since | 2025 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.05% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +21.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 11.15% |
| Max drawdown | -6.50% | -28.38% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.