Screener
GMOD vs RLY
GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF vs State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF
Key differences
GMOD is an alternative ETF, while RLY is a fixed income ETF.
- GMOD is an alternative fund, while RLY is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- GMOD follows a tactical allocation strategy; RLY uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| GMOD | RLY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $1.2B |
| Since | — | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.89% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +28.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +14.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.90 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 10.38% |
| Max drawdown | -6.50% | -34.17% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.