Screener
RLY vs GAL
State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF vs State Street Global Allocation ETF
Key differences
- GAL costs 0.15% less per year.
- RLY is significantly larger than GAL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RLY is classified as mixed asset, while GAL is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- RLY follows a active selection strategy; GAL uses tactical allocation.
Side-by-side comparison
| RLY | GAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.2B | $307M |
| Since | 2012 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 2.84% | 3.18% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.0% | +20.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.7% | +13.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.7% | +7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.12% | 8.71% |
| Max drawdown | -34.17% | -28.31% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RLY and GAL
Explore further