Screener
GMOD vs XNAV
GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF vs FundX Aggressive ETF
Key differences
Both GMOD and XNAV are alternative ETFs. GMOD charges 0.01% a year and XNAV 1.27%. The main difference: GMOD follows a tactical allocation strategy; XNAV uses active selection.
- GMOD follows a tactical allocation strategy; XNAV uses active selection.
- GMOD costs 1.27% less per year.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GMOD | XNAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.01% | 1.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $39M | $34M |
| Since | 2025 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.47% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +39.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +24.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 17.88% |
| Max drawdown | -6.50% | -24.27% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.