Screener
GMUN vs KORP
Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF vs American Century Diversified Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- GMUN costs 0.21% less per year.
- KORP is significantly larger than GMUN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GMUN covers north america markets; KORP covers global.
- GMUN follows a index tracking strategy; KORP uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, KORP has delivered higher annualized returns.
- KORP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GMUN | KORP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.08% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10M | $799M |
| Since | 2023 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 3.07% | 5.13% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.7% | +7.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.9% | +5.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.22 | 0.37 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.31% | 4.47% |
| Max drawdown | -4.35% | -14.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GMUN and KORP
Explore further