Screener
GMUN vs TAXF
Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF vs American Century Diversified Municipal Bond ETF
Key differences
- GMUN costs 0.19% less per year.
- TAXF is significantly larger than GMUN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GMUN follows a index tracking strategy; TAXF uses active selection.
- TAXF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GMUN | TAXF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.08% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10M | $627M |
| Since | 2023 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 3.07% | 3.82% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.7% | +7.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.9% | +3.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.22 | 0.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.31% | 3.09% |
| Max drawdown | -4.35% | -13.94% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GMUN and TAXF
Explore further