Screener
GNOM vs BBH
Global X Genomics & Biotechnology ETF vs VanEck Biotech ETF
Key differences
- BBH costs 0.15% less per year.
- BBH is significantly larger than GNOM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, BBH has delivered higher annualized returns.
- BBH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GNOM | BBH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $51M | $365M |
| Since | 2019 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 1.38% | 0.52% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +53.6% | +26.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | -2.6% | +5.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | -10.5% | +1.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.06 | 0.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.15% | 18.82% |
| Max drawdown | -75.00% | -39.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GNOM and BBH
Explore further