Screener
GNOM vs PPH
Global X Genomics & Biotechnology ETF vs VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF
Key differences
- PPH costs 0.14% less per year.
- PPH is significantly larger than GNOM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PPH has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PPH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GNOM | PPH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $51M | $966M |
| Since | 2019 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 1.38% | 2.12% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +53.6% | +24.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | -2.6% | +12.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | -10.5% | +9.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.06 | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.15% | 17.07% |
| Max drawdown | -75.00% | -29.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GNOM and PPH
Explore further