Screener
GNR vs KCE
State Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF
Key differences
- KCE costs 0.05% less per year.
- GNR is significantly larger than KCE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GNR covers global markets; KCE covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, KCE has delivered higher annualized returns.
- KCE has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GNR | KCE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.9B | $456M |
| Since | 2010 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 2.31% | 1.70% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.9% | +15.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.4% | +26.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.1% | +13.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.66 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.41% | 19.68% |
| Max drawdown | -48.59% | -40.78% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GNR and KCE
Explore further