Screener
GNR vs NANR
State Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
- NANR costs 0.05% less per year.
- GNR is significantly larger than NANR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GNR is classified as equity, while NANR is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- GNR covers global markets; NANR covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, NANR has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GNR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GNR | NANR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.9B | $795M |
| Since | 2010 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 2.31% | 1.45% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.9% | +53.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.4% | +19.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.1% | +16.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.66 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.41% | 18.21% |
| Max drawdown | -48.59% | -49.15% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GNR and NANR
Explore further