Screener
GOAU vs AUMI
U.S. Global GO GOLD and Precious Metal Miners ETF vs Themes Gold Miners ETF
Key differences
- AUMI costs 0.25% less per year.
- GOAU is significantly larger than AUMI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GOAU follows a active selection strategy; AUMI uses index tracking.
- GOAU has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GOAU | AUMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $187M | $30M |
| Since | 2017 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.95% | 0.86% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +48.2% | +65.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +31.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.83 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 45.60% | 47.96% |
| Max drawdown | -55.41% | -31.88% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GOAU and AUMI
Explore further