Screener
GPIX vs BALQ
Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF vs iShares Nasdaq Premium Income Active ETF
Key differences
- GPIX costs 0.06% less per year.
- GPIX is significantly larger than BALQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GPIX is classified as alternative, while BALQ is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- GPIX follows a option income strategy; BALQ uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| GPIX | BALQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.7B | $14M |
| Since | 2023 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 3.39% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.30% | — |
| Max drawdown | -17.50% | -11.79% |
Similar to GPIX and BALQ
Explore further