Skip to content
Screener

GPRF vs CGHM

Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF vs Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF

GPRF

Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF

Annual cost

0.45%

Fund size

$88M

CGHM

Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF

Annual cost

0.34%

Fund size

$3.1B

Key differences

Both GPRF and CGHM are fixed income ETFs. GPRF charges 0.45% a year and CGHM 0.34%. The main difference: CGHM costs 0.11% less per year.

  • CGHM costs 0.11% less per year.
  • CGHM is much larger than GPRF. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.

Side-by-side comparison

GPRFCGHM
Annual cost (TER)0.45%0.34%
Fund size (AUM)$88M$3.1B
Since20242024
Dividend yield5.61%3.82%
Asset classfixed incomefixed income
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+5.8%+9.2%
CAGR 3YN/AN/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/AN/A
Volatility 1Y3.76%3.13%
Max drawdown-4.36%-5.90%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to GPRF and CGHM