Skip to content
Screener

GPRF vs CGMU

Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF vs Capital Group Municipal Income ETF

GPRF

Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF

Annual cost

0.45%

Fund size

$88M

CGMU

Capital Group Municipal Income ETF

Annual cost

0.27%

Fund size

$6.1B

Key differences

Both GPRF and CGMU are fixed income ETFs. GPRF charges 0.45% a year and CGMU 0.27%. The main difference: CGMU costs 0.18% less per year.

  • CGMU costs 0.18% less per year.
  • CGMU is much larger than GPRF. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.

Side-by-side comparison

GPRFCGMU
Annual cost (TER)0.45%0.27%
Fund size (AUM)$88M$6.1B
Since20242022
Dividend yield5.61%3.34%
Asset classfixed incomefixed income
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+5.8%+6.6%
CAGR 3YN/A+4.7%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/A0.32
Volatility 1Y3.76%2.31%
Max drawdown-4.36%-4.10%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to GPRF and CGMU