Skip to content
Screener

GPRF vs CRDT

Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF vs Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF

GPRF

Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF

Annual cost

0.45%

Fund size

$88M

CRDT

Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF

Annual cost

0.99%

Fund size

$37M

Key differences

Both GPRF and CRDT are fixed income ETFs. GPRF charges 0.45% a year and CRDT 0.99%. The main difference: GPRF follows a index tracking strategy; CRDT uses active selection.

  • GPRF follows a index tracking strategy; CRDT uses active selection.
  • GPRF costs 0.54% less per year.

Side-by-side comparison

GPRFCRDT
Annual cost (TER)0.45%0.99%
Fund size (AUM)$88M$37M
Since20242023
Dividend yield5.61%6.19%
Asset classfixed incomefixed income
Regionnorth america
Strategyindex trackingactive selection
CAGR 1Y+5.8%+0.5%
CAGR 3YN/AN/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/AN/A
Volatility 1Y3.76%9.02%
Max drawdown-4.36%-9.80%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to GPRF and CRDT