Screener
GPRF vs SBAR
Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF vs Simplify Barrier Income ETF
Key differences
GPRF is a fixed income ETF, while SBAR is an alternative ETF. GPRF charges 0.45% a year and SBAR 0.75%.
- GPRF is a fixed income fund, while SBAR is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- GPRF follows a index tracking strategy; SBAR uses option income.
- GPRF costs 0.30% less per year.
- SBAR is much larger than GPRF. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| GPRF | SBAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $88M | $343M |
| Since | 2024 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 5.61% | 12.70% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.8% | +12.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.76% | 9.03% |
| Max drawdown | -4.36% | -5.32% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.