Skip to content
Screener

GPRF vs VRP

Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF vs Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF

GPRF

Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF

Annual cost

0.45%

Fund size

$88M

VRP

Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF

Annual cost

0.50%

Fund size

$2.9B

Key differences

Both GPRF and VRP are fixed income ETFs. GPRF charges 0.45% a year and VRP 0.50%. The main difference: VRP is much larger than GPRF. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.

  • VRP is much larger than GPRF. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • VRP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

GPRFVRP
Annual cost (TER)0.45%0.50%
Fund size (AUM)$88M$2.9B
Since20242014
Dividend yield5.61%6.31%
Asset classfixed incomefixed income
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+5.8%+6.7%
CAGR 3YN/A+9.7%
CAGR 5YN/A+4.3%
Sharpe 3YN/A1.30
Volatility 1Y3.76%2.89%
Max drawdown-4.36%-46.04%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to GPRF and VRP