Skip to content
Screener

GPRF vs VRIG

Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF vs Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF

GPRF

Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF

Annual cost

0.45%

Fund size

$88M

VRIG

Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF

Annual cost

0.30%

Fund size

$1.5B

Key differences

Both GPRF and VRIG are fixed income ETFs. GPRF charges 0.45% a year and VRIG 0.30%. The main difference: GPRF follows a index tracking strategy; VRIG uses active selection.

  • GPRF follows a index tracking strategy; VRIG uses active selection.
  • VRIG costs 0.15% less per year.
  • VRIG is much larger than GPRF. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • VRIG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

GPRFVRIG
Annual cost (TER)0.45%0.30%
Fund size (AUM)$88M$1.5B
Since20242016
Dividend yield5.61%4.80%
Asset classfixed incomefixed income
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingactive selection
CAGR 1Y+5.8%+5.0%
CAGR 3YN/A+6.0%
CAGR 5YN/A+4.4%
Sharpe 3YN/A2.84
Volatility 1Y3.76%0.50%
Max drawdown-4.36%-13.04%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to GPRF and VRIG