Screener
GPRF vs WABF
Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF vs Western Asset Bond ETF
Key differences
Both GPRF and WABF are fixed income ETFs. GPRF charges 0.45% a year and WABF 0.35%. The main difference: GPRF follows a index tracking strategy; WABF uses active selection.
- GPRF follows a index tracking strategy; WABF uses active selection.
- WABF costs 0.10% less per year.
- GPRF is much larger than WABF. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| GPRF | WABF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $88M | $16M |
| Since | 2024 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 5.61% | 4.80% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.8% | +5.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.72% | 3.71% |
| Max drawdown | -4.36% | -5.36% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.