Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

GPT vs AOM

Intelligent Alpha Atlas ETF vs iShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF

GPT

Intelligent Alpha Atlas ETF

Annual cost

0.69%

Fund size

$23M

AOM

iShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$1.8B

Key differences

GPT is an equity ETF, while AOM is a mixed asset ETF. GPT charges 0.69% a year and AOM 0.15%.

  • GPT is an equity fund, while AOM is a mixed asset fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • GPT follows a active selection strategy; AOM uses index tracking.
  • GPT covers global markets; AOM covers North America.
  • AOM costs 0.54% less per year.
  • AOM is much larger than GPT. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • AOM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

GPTAOM
Annual cost (TER)0.69%0.15%
Fund size (AUM)$23M$1.8B
Since20242008
Dividend yield0.67%2.98%
Asset classequitymixed asset
Regionglobalnorth america
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+27.7%+12.7%
CAGR 3YN/A+10.9%
CAGR 5YN/A+4.7%
Sharpe 3YN/A0.96
Volatility 1Y17.85%6.70%
Max drawdown-25.59%-19.96%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to GPT and AOM