Screener
GPZ vs EFV
VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF vs iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
Key differences
Both GPZ and EFV are equity ETFs. GPZ charges 0.40% a year and EFV 0.31%. The main difference: EFV costs 0.09% less per year.
- EFV costs 0.09% less per year.
- EFV is much larger than GPZ. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- EFV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GPZ | EFV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.31% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $245M | $30.1B |
| Since | 2025 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.77% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +25.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 14.33% |
| Max drawdown | -31.72% | -43.16% |
Similar to GPZ and EFV
Explore further