Screener
GPZ vs EFA
VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF vs iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
Key differences
Both GPZ and EFA are equity ETFs. GPZ charges 0.40% a year and EFA 0.32%. The main difference: GPZ covers global markets; EFA covers global markets excluding the US.
- GPZ covers global markets; EFA covers global markets excluding the US.
- EFA costs 0.08% less per year.
- EFA is much larger than GPZ. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- EFA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GPZ | EFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.32% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $245M | $77.4B |
| Since | 2025 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +18.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.86 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.27% |
| Max drawdown | -31.72% | -34.19% |
Similar to GPZ and EFA
Explore further