Screener
GPZ vs FMDE
VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF vs Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Core ETF
Key differences
- FMDE costs 0.17% less per year.
- FMDE is significantly larger than GPZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GPZ follows a index tracking strategy; FMDE uses index enhanced.
- FMDE has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GPZ | FMDE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.23% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $245M | $6.5B |
| Since | 2025 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.15% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +21.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 13.73% |
| Max drawdown | -31.72% | -21.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GPZ and FMDE
Explore further