Screener
GPZ vs ILOW
VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF vs AB International Low Volatility Equity ETF
Key differences
- GPZ costs 0.10% less per year.
- ILOW is significantly larger than GPZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GPZ follows a index tracking strategy; ILOW uses active selection.
- ILOW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GPZ | ILOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $245M | $1.7B |
| Since | 2025 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.54% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +13.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 13.51% |
| Max drawdown | -31.72% | -10.37% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GPZ and ILOW
Explore further