Screener
GPZ vs LOWV
VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF vs AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF
Key differences
- GPZ follows a index tracking strategy; LOWV uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| GPZ | LOWV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $245M | $199M |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.91% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +13.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.00 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 10.55% |
| Max drawdown | -31.72% | -13.87% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GPZ and LOWV
Explore further