Screener
GPZ vs LSEQ
VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF vs Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF
Key differences
- GPZ costs 1.88% less per year.
- GPZ is significantly larger than LSEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GPZ is classified as equity, while LSEQ is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- GPZ follows a index tracking strategy; LSEQ uses long short.
Side-by-side comparison
| GPZ | LSEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 2.28% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $245M | $15M |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.78% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +19.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 14.96% |
| Max drawdown | -31.72% | -8.35% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GPZ and LSEQ
Explore further