Screener
GPZ vs PEPS
VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF vs Parametric Equity Plus ETF
Key differences
- PEPS costs 0.30% less per year.
- GPZ is significantly larger than PEPS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GPZ is classified as equity, while PEPS is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- GPZ follows a index tracking strategy; PEPS uses option income.
Side-by-side comparison
| GPZ | PEPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.10% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $245M | $26M |
| Since | 2025 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.94% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +34.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 13.21% |
| Max drawdown | -31.72% | -9.79% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GPZ and PEPS
Explore further