Screener
GPZ vs VONE
VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF vs Vanguard Russell 1000 Index Fund ETF Shares
Key differences
- VONE costs 0.34% less per year.
- VONE is significantly larger than GPZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VONE has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GPZ | VONE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $245M | $10.8B |
| Since | 2025 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.04% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +28.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.22 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 12.13% |
| Max drawdown | -31.72% | -34.66% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GPZ and VONE
Explore further