Screener
GQQQ vs QINT
Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF vs American Century Quality Diversified International ETF
Key differences
- QINT is significantly larger than GQQQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GQQQ follows a active selection strategy; QINT uses index tracking.
- QINT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GQQQ | QINT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.34% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $130M | $590M |
| Since | 2024 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.44% | 2.54% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +43.2% | +27.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +20.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.78% | 14.91% |
| Max drawdown | -22.36% | -33.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GQQQ and QINT
Explore further