Screener
GQQQ vs SQLT
Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF vs Ishares MSCI USA Small-Cap Quality Factor ETF
Key differences
- SQLT costs 0.15% less per year.
- GQQQ is significantly larger than SQLT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GQQQ follows a active selection strategy; SQLT uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| GQQQ | SQLT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $130M | $7M |
| Since | 2024 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 0.44% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +43.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.78% | — |
| Max drawdown | -22.36% | -3.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GQQQ and SQLT
Explore further