Screener
SQLT vs QGRO
Ishares MSCI USA Small-Cap Quality Factor ETF vs American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF
Key differences
- SQLT costs 0.09% less per year.
- QGRO is significantly larger than SQLT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SQLT follows a index tracking strategy; QGRO uses index enhanced.
- QGRO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SQLT | QGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7M | $2.2B |
| Since | 2026 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.20% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +10.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.98 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.36% |
| Max drawdown | -3.95% | -32.56% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SQLT and QGRO
Explore further