Screener
GQQQ vs XMHQ
Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF
Key differences
- XMHQ costs 0.10% less per year.
- XMHQ is significantly larger than GQQQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GQQQ follows a active selection strategy; XMHQ uses index tracking.
- XMHQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GQQQ | XMHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $130M | $5.2B |
| Since | 2024 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.44% | 0.58% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +43.2% | +14.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.71 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.78% | 15.63% |
| Max drawdown | -22.36% | -36.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GQQQ and XMHQ
Explore further