Screener
GROZ vs CZA
Zacks Focus Growth ETF vs Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF
Key differences
- GROZ costs 0.14% less per year.
- GROZ follows a active selection strategy; CZA uses index tracking.
- CZA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GROZ | CZA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $90M | $184M |
| Since | 2024 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.04% | 1.47% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.8% | +14.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +14.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.73 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.54% | 12.79% |
| Max drawdown | -23.33% | -46.18% |
Similar to GROZ and CZA
Explore further