Screener
GRPZ vs IJT
Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF vs iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF
Key differences
- IJT costs 0.17% less per year.
- IJT is significantly larger than GRPZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IJT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GRPZ | IJT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3M | $7.3B |
| Since | 2024 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.90% | 0.77% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.3% | +28.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +15.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.65 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.82% | 17.64% |
| Max drawdown | -27.87% | -42.03% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GRPZ and IJT
Explore further