Screener
GRPZ vs RZG
Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF vs Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF
Key differences
- RZG is significantly larger than GRPZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RZG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GRPZ | RZG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3M | $121M |
| Since | 2024 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.90% | 0.42% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.3% | +32.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.76 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.82% | 18.58% |
| Max drawdown | -27.87% | -54.02% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GRPZ and RZG
Explore further