Screener
GRPZ vs RFG
Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF
Key differences
- RFG is significantly larger than GRPZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RFG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GRPZ | RFG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3M | $329M |
| Since | 2024 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.90% | 0.34% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.3% | +31.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.82% | 18.50% |
| Max drawdown | -27.87% | -42.92% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GRPZ and RFG
Explore further