Screener
GRPZ vs RPG
Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF
Key differences
- RPG is significantly larger than GRPZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RPG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GRPZ | RPG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3M | $1.8B |
| Since | 2024 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.90% | 0.19% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.3% | +36.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +26.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.82% | 19.62% |
| Max drawdown | -27.87% | -36.58% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GRPZ and RPG
Explore further