Screener
GRW vs FQAL
TCW Durable Growth ETF vs Fidelity Quality Factor ETF
Key differences
Both GRW and FQAL are equity ETFs. GRW charges 0.75% a year and FQAL 0.15%. The main difference: GRW follows a active selection strategy; FQAL uses index tracking.
- GRW follows a active selection strategy; FQAL uses index tracking.
- FQAL costs 0.60% less per year.
- FQAL is much larger than GRW. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| GRW | FQAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $72M | $1.4B |
| Since | 2016 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.26% | 1.12% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -8.9% | +19.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.05% | 11.47% |
| Max drawdown | -23.84% | -33.71% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.