Screener
GRW vs SUPP
TCW Durable Growth ETF vs TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF
Key differences
- GRW is significantly larger than SUPP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GRW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GRW | SUPP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $72M | $12M |
| Since | 2016 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.28% | 0.30% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -7.9% | +31.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.80 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.49% | 19.39% |
| Max drawdown | -23.84% | -25.03% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GRW and SUPP
Explore further